Derivative of Inverse Functions
Let's now develop a formula that relates the derivative of a function's inverse to the derivative of the original function. We'll first use a geometric approach, which offers tremendous insight into why the two derivatives are related as they are. We'll then use the Chain Rule to develop the same result, and show you a procedure that always works even if you don't remember the formula.
Geometric Development of the Inverse Function Theorem
To start, suppose
The geometric derivation above concludes that if f and g are inverse functions, then the derivative of
Inverse Function theorem:
If two functions
Equivalently, since
The last line above can be difficult to parse and remember, due to the primes and inverse "–1" notation, and so we recommend remembering the formula using g and f instead.
The key insight is that to find the derivative of a function's inverse
Development of the Inverse Function theorem using the Chain Rule
Let's now use the Chain Rule to develop the same result.
We begin with a fundamental property of inverse functions: If g and f are inverse functions, then
Let's now take the derivative of both sides of that equation, remembering to apply the Chain Rule to the left-hand side:
This of course is the same result as we found above geometrically. Notice in particular that, once again, we evaluate
Examples and Scaffolded Practice
Let's consider some Examples.
Example 1: Table of values
The table shows input and output values for a smooth, continuous, one-to-one function
Find
Solution.
We use the Inverse Function theorem:
The crucial first move here is to find
Next we look in the same row of the table to find
Then finally using the Inverse Function theorem,
Scaffolded Practice Problem #1
Using the same table as Example 1, find
Solution.
From the Inverse Function theorem we know
Step 1. Find
Step 2. Use the value of
In the next Example we'll use three different approaches to calculate the derivative of the inverse function of
Example 2:
Consider the function
Solution.
We'll solve this using three approaches to illustrate various ways you can find the result.
Method 1. Use the explicit inverse function
Let's see how the Inverse Function theorem leads to the same result.
Method 2. Use the Inverse Function theorem.
The input to
Next, we find the derivative of f:
Method 3. Start with the defining relation for inverse functions, and use the Chain Rule. Let's say you didn't immediately remember the Inverse Function theorem. (It happens!) If you're given an expression for the function f, you can always proceed from the defining relation for inverse functions,
Notice that we actually just developed the Inverse Function theorem for the particular function
We still have to realize that since we have
Let's consider a third Example, now one where we don't immediately know what the inverse function is, and so we instead move immediately to use the Inverse Function theorem.
Example 3:
Let
Hint: Use inspection to determine
Solution.
The Inverse Function theorem says
To find
Let's try
That's not what we were looking for. Let's next try
Ah, that's it:
Next, let's find
Then
Now returning to the Inverse Function theorem:
Practice Problems
Time to practice!
| value of x | ||
|---|---|---|
| –2 | —1 | 2 |
| –1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 5 | –1 |
[Hint: Determine
The graph shows the inverse of a particular function
View/Hide Solution
We start with the Inverse Function theorem, noting that we want
From the graph, we see
From the graph, we see the slope of
The Upshot
- The Inverse Function theorem states that if two functions
and𝑓 are inverses, then𝑔 Equivalently, since𝑔 ′ ( 𝑥 ) = 1 𝑓 ′ ( 𝑔 ( 𝑥 ) ) :𝑔 ( 𝑥 ) = 𝑓 − 1 ( 𝑥 ) [ 𝑓 − 1 ] ′ ( 𝑥 ) = 1 𝑓 ′ ( 𝑓 − 1 ( 𝑥 ) )
As always, if you have comments or questions about anything on this screen, please let us know at our Forum (where it's easy for you and us to write math easily).