C.6 Limits of Rational Functions

Let's now examine the limit as x goes to positive or negative infinity of rational functions, which are formed by dividing one polynomial by another polynomial. We'll make direct use of the ideas of dominance that we developed on the preceding screen.

Indeed, building off of that earlier work, the reasoning here is straightforward. Let's consider a general rational function of the form (𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑀+ (smaller terms)).

Quick, informal reasoning: Identify the term in the numerator with the highest power, and the term in the denominator with the highest power. You can then ignore all of the smaller terms just as we did for the polynomials earlier. We can do this both as 𝑥 ,

lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑀+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑀

and 𝑥 ,

lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑀+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑀

Then compare the power in the numerator to the power in the denominator. There are three possibilities, each with its own result: (1) the highest power in the numerator is the same as that in the denominator (𝑁 =𝑀); (2) the highest power in the denominator is greater than that in the numerator (𝑀 >𝑁);) (3) the highest power in the numerator is greater that in the denominator (𝑁 >𝑀).

We'll examine an example of each below to determine the various results.

Formal development of the limit: If you need to develop the limit more formally, divide every term in the function by the largest power in the denominator and then proceed to find the limit.

Let's consider an example of each possibility at both and to determine the various results.

Case 1: Rational Function with equal highest powers in the numerator and denominator

Let's look first at what happens when the largest powers in the numerator and denominator are equal, and as 𝑥 +.

Explore Case 1, +: Rational Function with Equal Largest Powers in Numerator & Denominator, as 𝑥

Find lim𝑥2𝑥4+5𝑥2+18𝑥95𝑥4+47𝑥2+138.

Quick, informal reasoning.

Notice that the largest power in the numerator and the denominator are the same, 𝑥4 :

Let's next consider a different rational function with equal largest-powers in the numerator and denominator, now as 𝑥 .

Explore Case 1, : Rational Function with Equal Largest Powers in Numerator & Denominator, as 𝑥

Find lim𝑥𝑥23𝑥62𝑥2+8.

Quick, informal reasoning.

Notice that the largest powers in the numerator and denominator are equal, 𝑥2 : lim𝑥𝑥23𝑥62𝑥2+8=lim𝑥𝑥22𝑥2=12 Hence we can make the function's output values as close to 12 as we'd like by making x sufficiently large and negative, as you can see using the interactive calculator below.

If you'd like, you can use the checkbox beneath the graph to show the horizontal line 𝑦 = 12 to aid your visualization.

Formal development of the limit

We proceed by dividing every term in the numerator and in the denominator by the largest term in the denominator, 𝑥2 :

lim𝑥𝑥23𝑥62𝑥2+8=lim𝑥𝑥2𝑥23𝑥𝑥26𝑥22𝑥2𝑥2+8𝑥2=lim𝑥13𝑥6𝑥22+8𝑥2=lim𝑥(1)lim𝑥3𝑥0lim𝑥6𝑥20lim𝑥2+lim𝑥8𝑥20=12

Summary of Case 1, and Horizontal Asymptotes

The explorations above show that when the largest powers in the numerator and denominator are equal, then as 𝑥 lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑁=𝐴𝐵 That is, the limit is the ratio of the coefficients of those largest-power terms.

y = A/B is a horizontal asymptote

Furthermore, because the limit is a constant, as 𝑥 the function resembles the horizontal line 𝑦 =𝐴𝐵, which is known as a horizontal asymptote.

Similarly, as 𝑥 lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑁=𝐴𝐵 And now as 𝑥  the function again resembles the horizontal line 𝑦 =𝐴𝐵, and so there is a horizontal asymptote in the negative direction as well.

We'll provide some practice problems below that ask you to determine the horizontal asymptote for a function, which means finding the limit as 𝑥 and 𝑥 as we did above.

For now, let's move on to Case 2.

Case 2: Rational Function where the denominator has the largest power

Explore Case 2: Rational Function with Largest Power in Denominator

Find lim𝑥𝑥33𝑥2+6𝑥2𝑥6+𝑥2+9 and lim𝑥𝑥33𝑥2+6𝑥2𝑥6+𝑥2+9

Quick, informal reasoning.

We'll proceed more quickly, and do both limits at once since the conclusion is straightforward:

lim𝑥𝑥33𝑥2+6𝑥2𝑥6+𝑥2+9=lim𝑥𝑥32𝑥6=lim𝑥12𝑥3=0

And as 𝑥 :

lim𝑥𝑥33𝑥2+6𝑥2𝑥6+𝑥2+9=lim𝑥𝑥32𝑥6=lim𝑥12𝑥3=0

You can view the function's behavior visually in the interactive calculator below.

Formal development of the limit

As before, we begin by dividing every term in the function by the largest term in the denominator, 𝑥6 :

lim𝑥𝑥33𝑥2+6𝑥2𝑥6+𝑥2+9=lim𝑥𝑥3𝑥63𝑥2𝑥6+6𝑥𝑥62𝑥6𝑥6+𝑥2𝑥6+9𝑥6=lim𝑥1𝑥33𝑥4+6𝑥52+1𝑥4+9𝑥6=lim𝑥1𝑥30lim𝑥3𝑥40+lim𝑥6𝑥50lim𝑥2+lim𝑥1𝑥40+lim𝑥9𝑥60=02=0

Development of the limit as 𝑥 is exactly the same except for replacing for in the limit, so we won't both writing it out. (It'd be a good exercise for you to do, though, for practice!)

Summary for Case 2: If the largest power in the denominator of a rational function is larger than any power in the numerator, then the limit at ± is zero. The reason is simple: the denominator is growing faster than the numerator, and so dominates, or "wins," the overall behavior of the fraction, forcing the function to zero as x grows large in either direction.

Case 3: Rational Function where the numerator has the largest power

The result here won't be surprising, but let's take a look at an example function anyway for completeness.

Explore Case 3: Rational Function with Largest Power in Numerator

Find lim𝑥𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8 and lim𝑥𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8

Quick, informal reasoning.

lim𝑥𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8=lim𝑥𝑥53𝑥4=lim𝑥13𝑥=

and as 𝑥 :

lim𝑥𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8=lim𝑥𝑥53𝑥4=lim𝑥13𝑥=

Notice that in both cases the limit produces

lim𝑥±𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8=lim𝑥±13𝑥

Hence as 𝑥 ± the function resembles the line 𝑦 =𝑥3, as you can see using the "Show/Hide the line" button immediately beneath the graph. This line is known as a tilted asymptote.

Formal development of the limit

We yet again every term in the numerator and denominator by the largest power in the denominator, 𝑥4 :

lim𝑥𝑥5+3𝑥2+2𝑥3𝑥4+8=lim𝑥𝑥5𝑥4+3𝑥2𝑥4+2𝑥𝑥43𝑥4𝑥4+8𝑥4=lim𝑥𝑥+3𝑥2+2𝑥33+8𝑥4=lim𝑥𝑥+lim𝑥3𝑥20+lim𝑥2𝑥30lim𝑥3+lim𝑥8𝑥40=13lim𝑥𝑥=

If you'd like, you can repeat the development for yourself to show that the limit as 𝑥 is .

Summary for Case 3: If the largest power in the numerator is greater than any power in the denominator, then the limit as 𝑥 and the limit as 𝑥 does not exist, and is either or .


Tip icon

Most students find trying to memorize the results above . . . well, kinda overwhelming. So don't. Instead, use the reasoning skills we've been building on this and the preceding screens, and write down a line for yourself that shows the dominance: as 𝑥 ±, only the largest terms in the numerator and denominator matter. Once you do that, the resulting conclusion will be clear depending on which, if either, of those terms is larger, And if they're equal, the resulting fraction that is the limit (and horizontal asymptote) presents itself.

You can practice this simple move in the problems below, along with writing out the formal reasoning if your course requires that.

[That all said, you'll find a graphic that summarizes all of the results of this and the preceding screen in "The Upshot" at the bottom of this screen.]

Practice Problems: Limits of Rational Functions

Practice Problem 1
Find lim𝑥𝑥+7𝑥3𝑥+2. (A) 1(B) 0(C) (D) 72(E) none of these
Practice Problem 2
Find lim𝑥(3𝑥+2)(1𝑥)(𝑥+3)(2𝑥1). (A) 32(B) 32(C) 23(D) 23(E) DNE
Practice Problem 3
Find lim𝑥𝑥2+3𝑥𝑥+1. (A) 1(B) 0(C) (D) 3(E) none of these
Practice Problem 4
Find the horizontal asymptotes of  5𝑥2+𝑥33𝑥22𝑥+5.

This has been a pretty quick pass through the various possibilities for the limit as 𝑥 of rational functions.

What questions or comments do you have? Are you perhaps working on a homework problem that you're having trouble solving? Please let us know over on the Forum.

And on the next screen, we'll examine exponential and logarithmic functions and see how their dominance compares to that of polynomials. Once you have that understanding, you'll have essentially all of the tools you need to work with any limits you encounter in this first part of the course!


The Upshot

  1. When considering lim𝑥±, let dominance in the numerator and denominator do their work: lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑀+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑀 lim𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑁+ (smaller terms))(𝐵𝑥𝑀+ (smaller terms))=lim𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑁𝐵𝑥𝑀 Once you've done that step, the rest of the reasoning should be clear.
  2. If you'd like a summary graphic of this and the preceding screen that you can save:
    Limits at infinity summary