A.4 Lab 2.1: Find a Limit Using Approximations
On this screen we're going to determine the limit of a function at a point where the function is undefined, using an approach that's very similar to that of Lab 1.1 at the end of Chapter 1.
Reminder:
The limit of the function
such that
whenever
The function we're going to consider for this lab is
We don't know (or pretend to not know, anyway) the exact height, the y-value, of that hole. But we have marked its approximate location on the y-axis with the label "L" since the (currently unknown) exact value of this y-location is
Note: If you have taken Calculus before, you may know a fancy way to compute this limit exactly. You could also use any number of online resources to find its value easily. Please don't. Later in the course we're going to need the crucial ideas and tools we're developing here, and so ask that you complete the activities below. In the end we don't really care what "the answer" is to this particular limit; instead, we care that you're working to develop an understanding of Calculus and its tools that will allow you to do whatever you want in the future.
Lab Activity: Approximate 𝐿 = l i m 𝑥 → 1 2 𝑥 − 2 𝑥 − 1
This lab is based on work done by the CLEAR Calculus Project at Oklahoma State University. From the Project's website: "Project CLEAR Calculus is a research-based effort to make calculus conceptually accessible to more students while simultaneously increasing the coherence, rigor, and applicability of the content learned in the courses."
We at Matheno appreciate the work CLEAR Calculus has done to help students learn Calculus better, and are happy to build off of their efforts.
As we did in the earlier lab, let's use our Questions for Approximations to frame our work. We'll consider the first of the questions now. Please answer each Question for yourself before reading our discussion:
Questions for Approximations [Reference]
1. What are you approximating?
2. How will you generate an overestimate for the value we're after? An underestimate?
[Hint: Look at the graph, and think about where you would "sample" the function's data to produce a value that is explicitly larger than or less than the height of the hole.]
We'll discuss the remaining questions in a bit. As a reminder, they are:
3. The difference between your current overestimate and underestimate values is your "error bound." What is its current value?
4. How can the error bound be made smaller than any predetermined value?
For now, let's get to approximating!
Part II: Lower Bound, Estimate from the Left
[Instructions will appear here after you add your data point in Part 1.]
Part III: Decrease the error bound to within a predetermined size
[Instructions will appear here after you add your data point in Part 2.]
And as one final question . . .
Now that you have found a value of d that gives an error bound < 0.001, what is the largest value of d to within four decimal places that meets this criterion?
The largest value of d that still gives an error bound of 0.001 is:
We think it is important that you have the experience, once, of "zeroing in" on a limit by generating the function's output values for input values of x that are increasingly close to
For now, if you have any questions or comments about anything on this screen, or about limits in general, please do our Learning Community a favor and post them on the Forum!
The Upshot
- We can estimate the limit of a function to within any error bound we choose by sampling the function's output at input values sufficiently close to the point of interest.
Reference for Oehrtman's Five Questions:
Oehrtman, M. (2008). Layers of abstraction: Theory and design for the instruction of limit concepts. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (MAA Notes, Vol. 73, pp. 65-80). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.